Measured by effectiveness

(Baonghean) - The most accurate way to evaluate staff is based on their effectiveness and ability to complete tasks, sir!

- This is obvious, but why are you hesitating at this time?

- Ah, because this is the end of the year. The time to look back at the tasks achieved, the goals and targets achieved in 1 year. It is the time for organizations, units, levels and sectors to review and re-evaluate cadres and party members in receiving and implementing assigned tasks.

- Is there something bothering you?

- Not really worrying, but I have drawn a few conclusions. That is, some people, every time they attend conferences or meetings, make promises, speak "eloquently", and present solutions and measures. But when it comes to summarizing the year, through inspection and evaluation, it is "revealed" that they "speak beyond their human stature". They are only good at "polishing" themselves, good at speaking, but in reality, taking on and carrying out the assigned tasks in front of the group, they are nowhere. Some people even neglect their work, only focusing on "tricks", "doing things is bad, reporting is good".

- Oh, I see...

- Meanwhile, at the end of the year, through the results of inspections and practical examinations in many places, it was shown that the implementation and organization of the implementation of action programs to achieve the goals set at the beginning of the year were very scientific and effective. Not only did the internal agencies highly appreciate it, but the masses also greatly appreciated it. Not only did the emulation movements develop strongly and substantially, but the people's lives and the appearance of agencies, units, and localities also changed fundamentally in a sustainable direction.

- So what do you conclude from that?

- Well, the conclusion is that cadres should be evaluated not only through words, but also through the results of actions and practical activities. And therefore, evaluating the role and position of each individual needs to be through the results of directing or performing assigned tasks, through the tasks that the individual undertakes before the collective. That is, individual evaluation must be closely linked to the results of the collective, the agency, and the unit. Avoid the situation of "distribution", "leveling"... in the evaluation and classification. Avoid reflecting incorrectly the reality of the movement and the role of movement leadership, affecting the motivation to strive.

- To do so, all levels, sectors and localities need to always grasp information from the grassroots and from practice. Not only focusing on grasping basic personal information, but also needing to grasp full information about the practical movement and the implementation of tasks at the grassroots. And once the effectiveness of the implementation of the work is grasped, the evaluation and classification will be more convincing and widespread.

Duc Duong