Reader's Corner

Readers and the editorial team

During the week (June 6-13), Nghe An Newspaper received complaints and feedback from the following citizens:

- Ms. Vo Thi Lan, from Hamlet 2, Nghi Kim Commune, Vinh City, continues to complain about the Nghi Kim Commune People's Committee cutting off her son's agricultural land allocation under Decree 64/CP, even though her son has permanent residency in the commune (he was only temporarily absent from the area for work). Ms. Lan's complaint to the editorial office stems from her claim that she has repeatedly appealed to the Nghi Kim Commune People's Committee, formerly the Nghi Loc District People's Committee and now the Vinh City People's Committee, but the issue remains unresolved.

- Mr. Nguyen Van Hung, from Nghe An Mountain Development Joint Stock Company, raised several issues related to the company's production and business situation; the management of the company's assets and capital at commercial centers in mountainous districts; the undemocratic management style of the Board of Directors, which leads to the ineffectiveness of the supervisory role of shareholders…

- Ms. Nguyen Thi Lan, working at Nghi Thinh Commune Kindergarten, Nghi Loc District, has submitted a petition regarding her nearly 30 years of experience as a kindergarten teacher, starting from a difficult period. She later received training to become a childcare teacher (cook). Now, according to provincial regulations, a large number of teachers have been granted permanent positions, but due to their job roles, they are employed under labor contracts each school year with extremely low salaries (1.05 million VND/month) and are required to pay voluntary social insurance, making their lives very difficult. Each month, because there are few childcare teachers and they have to cook for hundreds of children, she recently petitioned the school's management and the District Education and Training Department for a solution to increase salaries and improve living conditions, but her request has not yet been resolved.

Editorial Board and Readers

- The content of the complaint and inquiry from Mr. Le Duc Cuong, a Party member and veteran in Hamlet 3, Quynh Hoa Commune, Quynh Luu District, concerns that he was falsely accused by another Party member in Hamlet 1 Party Branch regarding his eligibility for preferential treatment as a veteran who participated in the resistance war, according to Decision 142/QD-TTg of the Prime Minister, which affected his reputation and honor. Now, according to the Politburo's regulations on 19 prohibited actions for Party members, in your opinion, should the aforementioned Party member be considered for disciplinary action to serve as an example and educational measure?

According to the information he provided and the accompanying documents, including Document No. 04/KL-BCH dated February 17, 2011, from the Military Command of Quynh Luu District, the conclusion after verifying and reviewing the complaint was that: The allegations made by Mr. Nguyen Van Cai, a Party member of Branch 1, against him are unfounded; the granting of preferential treatment under Decision No. 142/QD-TTg by the competent authorities is in accordance with the standards and conditions; the complainant was unaware of his work history and therefore made a false accusation.

- The complaint from Ms. Vuong Van in Dinh hamlet, Tam Hop commune, Quy Hop district concerns the hamlet's leadership committee misusing 1.5 tons of rice allocated by the government for famine relief during Tet 2012 to purchase loudspeaker equipment for the hamlet.

Regarding this matter, Nghe An Newspaper has already reported on it via its hotline and sent Official Letter No. 167/PCBĐ.BNA dated April 15, 2012, to the Chairman of the People's Committee of Quy Hop District and the Chief Inspector of Quy Hop District for consideration, resolution, and response to Nghe An Newspaper. Nearly two months have passed, and the deadline for responding to the complaint, as stipulated by the Press Law, has expired. However, the Chairman of the People's Committee of Quy Hop District has not yet provided an official response to the editorial board of Nghe An Newspaper, thus Nghe An Newspaper lacks the basis to publish an official reply for readers and the public to know. Nevertheless, through various information channels, the matter has been reviewed, and initial verification results indicate that the sale of relief rice by the Dinh Hamlet Committee is real and the responsibility of those involved is currently being investigated.

Readers' Room