"The dismissal of Mr. Vu Huy Hoang is an unprecedented action."

November 4, 2016 22:14

National Assembly Secretary General Nguyen Hanh Phuc stated that dismissing Vu Huy Hoang from his position after he no longer held it was an unprecedented action.

This afternoon (November 4th), speaking to the press on the sidelines of the National Assembly, Mr. Nguyen Hanh Phuc, Secretary General of the National Assembly, stated that the Party Central Committee has just decided to discipline Mr. Vu Huy Hoang, former Minister of Industry and Trade, and that decision has been announced to the public. Currently, the government will hand over the matter to the Party Committee of the Government and the Party, and the National Assembly delegation will request further study on the disciplinary process.

Tổng thư ký Quốc hội Nguyễn Hạnh Phúc
Secretary General of the National Assembly Nguyen Hanh Phuc

Mr. Phuc emphasized: "This is a very difficult matter because Mr. Hoang has now been relieved of his duties by the 13th National Assembly. He no longer holds the position of Minister. Considering disciplinary action against someone who no longer holds a position must be left to the Government; the National Assembly will study the relevant legal regulations."

This task is being assigned to agencies assisting the Government and the National Assembly to study the legal aspects. Because when it is presented to the National Assembly, it must have full legal validity.

When dealing with a person who no longer holds a position and has been dismissed by the National Assembly, what is the procedure? What is the process to ensure compliance with the law? Discipline must be very strict but also in accordance with the law. That is why the agencies are currently carrying out this process.”

Mr. Phuc stated: "We only provided the information on the evening of November 3rd, and the document from the Party Central Committee was sent this afternoon. Currently, we are assigning relevant agencies to conduct research, but whether it will be quick or slow depends on the research results and recommendations."

The process is as follows: the Government, when making an appointment, must propose it to the National Assembly for approval. Based on the Government's proposal, the National Assembly then approves the position. Only after the National Assembly approves it does it go to the President for appointment.

First of all, the government now submits a proposal. If, under normal circumstances, the person is still in office and there are no issues, the government will propose a solution to be presented to the National Assembly for consideration. If the National Assembly does not approve it, for example, the President may impose disciplinary action. Therefore, any process when a person no longer holds that position, when a person has been relieved of their duties, needs to be reviewed and ensured to be in accordance with the law.

Mr. Phuc stated that the Central Committee of the Party had recently taken a very serious approach, publicly disclosing Mr. Hoang's violations and reaching very clear and serious conclusions.

"I hear that the people and voters are very supportive, but how the government handles it still needs to be studied by relevant agencies to ensure it is in accordance with the law," Mr. Phuc said.

Mr. Phuc stated clearly: During the process, naturally, many agencies share responsibility in the monitoring process. It's possible that nothing was detected at that time, but with a sense of responsibility, we will handle any violations that are discovered, without leniency or exception.

Mr. Phuc affirmed: Regardless of who violates the law, they must be punished. If we haven't discovered it yet, we must accept the consequences, but once we have discovered it, we must handle it very seriously. That's a clear stance. Recently, the Central Steering Committee for Anti-Corruption, headed by the General Secretary, has acted very resolutely, uncovering many issues and cases that voters thought would be swept under the rug, but in reality, they have been dealt with very seriously. Clearly, we announce what we've done, ensuring that the law is fair, transparent, and reasonable, that those who have committed wrongdoings accept the consequences, and that voters agree.

Many argue that dismissing someone once they no longer hold a position is meaningless. Mr. Phuc analyzed: This is unprecedented; it's the first time someone has been dismissed after they've left their position. This is very difficult, but it also has a deterrent effect. Even though they've retired, the law allows for disciplinary action, so they will be taken./.

According to VOV.VN

RELATED NEWS