Compete to admit your shortcomings!

(Baonghean) - Avoid the situation of competing to receive incentives, but then remaining silent. Not only will the shortcomings not be limited or overcome, but they will also risk increasing.

Hey, the implementation of reviewing cadres and party members in the spirit of Resolution 4 of the Central Committee (12th tenure) has reached the grassroots and sub-grassroots levels. According to the general assessment, this Resolution has entered life, has a clear address and content, sir!

- That's right! If we want to build and rectify, but just "shoot in the air" and hit no one, the effect will not be high. This time, 27 signs of degradation, "self-transformation", "self-transformation" are identified; each cadre and each party member cannot stand aside. Everyone must identify themselves and contribute ideas to their comrades. Therefore, it is difficult for anyone to avoid it. Each individual and each collective has been clearly pointed out the strengths and weaknesses associated with the strong and weak points of the work field they are responsible for, undertake, and are related to.

- At a facility we visited, we heard a very interesting story of "reversing the situation". At first, no one dared to admit their shortcomings because they were afraid that if they did, they would be disciplined. After listening to the guidance team from the superiors discuss and guide them, we learned that the goal of identification is to look straight at the weaknesses, frankly acknowledge, analyze, and find solutions to overcome and correct them. Only when it is serious, and the individual or group does not have the spirit of serious identification, does not accept comments, does not correct, or corrects without results, then disciplinary action is proposed.

Localities organize reviews in the spirit of Central Resolution 4. Photo: Internet

After being guided and analyzed, there is a phenomenon that party members all identify their own shortcomings. Some party members even consider accepting many shortcomings as a high expression of exemplary behavior, so they admit many shortcomings, making other party members feel that they are accepting too much. That "no one is perfect", no one is perfect and absolutely perfect, so assuming that there are small shortcomings is normal, but if they admit shortcomings when they are related, I'm afraid it is a bit too much!

- Actually, admitting many shortcomings is not a matter of concern. The matter of concern here is whether or not there is a solution to overcome the shortcomings, whether or not there is a real willingness and seriousness in correcting the shortcomings.

- I also agree with this concept. Competing to admit shortcomings is good. But it would be better if there was competition to overcome and correct shortcomings. Avoid the situation where, when reviewing, people admit many shortcomings, but then do not care, and go back to the same old thing. If you admit shortcomings but do not correct them, then you will have another shortcoming, which is "talking but not doing", "talking but not doing"... And it is also a manifestation of dishonesty, insincerity, and lack of seriousness in conducting the review.

- Therefore, the important thing for Party committees at all levels is that after conducting reviews in the spirit of Resolution 4 of the Central Committee, it is necessary to do a good job of inspecting and supervising the implementation of solutions to overcome and correct shortcomings, problems and limitations. Avoid the situation of competing to admit shortcomings, but then remaining silent, the shortcomings not only are not limited or overcome, but also have the risk of increasing.

Duc Duong