Compete to admit your shortcomings!

(Baonghean) - Avoid the situation of competing to receive incentives, but then remaining silent. Not only will the shortcomings not be limited or overcome, but they will also risk increasing.

Hey, the implementation of reviewing cadres and party members in the spirit of Resolution 4 of the Central Committee (term XII) has reached the grassroots and sub-grassroots levels. According to the general assessment, this Resolution has entered life, has a clear address and content, sir!

- That's right! If we want to build and rectify, but just "shoot in the air" and hit no one, the effect will not be high. This time, 27 signs of degradation, "self-transformation", "self-transformation" have been identified. Each cadre and each party member cannot stand aside. Everyone must identify themselves and give advice to their comrades to identify. Therefore, it is difficult for anyone to avoid it. Each individual and each collective has been clearly identified with their strengths and weaknesses associated with the strengths and weaknesses of the work areas they are responsible for, undertake, and are related to.

- At a facility we visited, we heard a very interesting story of "reversing the situation". At first, no one dared to admit their shortcomings, because they were afraid that if they did, they would be disciplined. After listening to the guidance team from the superiors discuss and guide them, they learned that the goal of identification is to look straight at the weaknesses, frankly acknowledge, analyze, and find solutions to overcome and correct. Only when it is serious, the individual or group does not have the spirit of serious identification, does not accept comments, does not correct, or corrects without results, then disciplinary action is proposed.

Localities organize reviews in the spirit of Central Resolution 4. Photo: Internet

After being guided and analyzed, there is a phenomenon that party members all identify their own shortcomings. Some party members even consider accepting many shortcomings as a high expression of exemplary behavior, so they admit many shortcomings, making other party members feel that they are accepting too much. That "no one is perfect", no one is absolutely perfect, so assuming that there are small shortcomings is also normal, if you admit shortcomings whenever you are involved, I'm afraid it is a bit too much!

- Actually, admitting many shortcomings is not a matter of concern. The matter of concern here is whether or not there is a solution to overcome the shortcomings, whether or not there is a real willingness and seriousness in correcting the shortcomings.

- I also agree with this concept. Competing to admit shortcomings is good. But it would be better if there was competition to overcome and correct shortcomings. Avoid the situation where, when reviewing, people admit many shortcomings, but then do not care, and go back to the way things were. If you admit shortcomings but do not correct them, you will have another shortcoming, which is "talking but not doing", "talking but not doing"... And it is also a manifestation of dishonesty, insincerity, and lack of seriousness in conducting the review.

- Therefore, the important thing for Party committees at all levels is that after conducting reviews in the spirit of Resolution 4 of the Central Committee, it is necessary to carry out well the inspection and supervision of the implementation of solutions to overcome and correct shortcomings, existing problems and limitations. Avoid the situation of competing to admit shortcomings, but then remaining silent, the shortcomings not only are not limited and overcome, but also have the risk of increasing.

Duc Duong