President Trump's timely victory

Victory after victory

The United States-Mexico-Canada Agreement, or USMCA, was approved by the US Senate with 89 votes in favor and 10 against. The trade pact, signed by President Trump in November 2018, also received a similar “ticket” of approval from the House of Representatives last month.

The measure is “another trade victory for American workers,” replacing the “job-killing, massively failed NAFTA,” according to a statement from the White House press secretary.

“The USMCA, which the President successfully negotiated more than a year ago, rebalances trade between the three countries and will lead to significant economic and job growth in the United States,” the statement said.

US Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell arrives at Capitol Hill on January 16. Getty Images

Individual US senators have also hailed the benefits of the new deal to their constituents, with Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell calling it “a big win for Kentucky and all 50 states.” Speaking on the Senate floor on January 15, he added that the deal was “a big win for the country. A big win for the Trump administration.”

President Trump can now claim to have fulfilled his campaign pledge to get tough on trade.

The USMCA is intended to replace the North American Free Trade Agreement, negotiated by President George H.W. Bush in the 1990s and pushed through Congress by President Bill Clinton.

With a renegotiated trade pact with Mexico and Canada and the signing on January 15 of a preliminary trade agreement with China that aims to end a long and fraught trade war, Mr. Trump can now claim to have fulfilled his campaign pledge to be tough on trade and to eliminate “bad deals” made by his predecessors.

The US-Mexico-Canada Agreement is seen as a victory for President Trump.

Sen. Richard Shelby tweeted that the deal would boost trade across the state and benefit “farmers, manufacturers, and businesses.” Sen. Shelley Moore Capito added that the deal “gives a 21st century update to our trade policies with Mexico and Canada.”

Meanwhile, Trump's re-election campaign also took advantage of the situation to attack his rival, Senator Bernie Sanders, one of 10 lawmakers who voted against USMCA.

“Socialist Bernie Sanders has proudly voted against new jobs and higher wages for American workers,” the Trump campaign wrote in an email to supporters on Jan. 16. “Sanders is willing to sacrifice blue-collar jobs and rising wages, even as he enjoys flying fossil fuel-burning private jets almost daily.”

President Trump at a campaign rally in Michigan on December 18. Photo: AFP

New bottle, new wine?

Many economists argue that NAFTA has been a major boost to North American economies, as it has removed trade barriers, reduced tariffs and increased foreign investment, particularly in Mexico. But critics, including Trump and many Republicans, say NAFTA has pushed American jobs across the border. The US president has frequently called NAFTA “perhaps the worst trade deal ever.”

In fact, NAFTA did not cause large job losses nor did it create large economic benefits.

A 2017 report by the nonpartisan Congressional Research Service concluded that the impact of NAFTA over the past quarter-century has been difficult to tease apart.

“A major challenge in assessing NAFTA is separating the effects of the agreement from other factors,” the report said. “US trade with Mexico and Canada was growing before NAFTA and would likely have continued without the agreement. In fact, NAFTA did not cause the large job losses that critics feared, nor did it generate the large economic gains that supporters predicted.”

Leaders of Mexico, the US and Canada at the USMCA signing ceremony in November 2018 in Argentina. Photo: AP

The new deal does offer some modest benefits over its predecessor. According to a 2019 report by the U.S. International Trade Commission (ITC), the USMCA would boost gross domestic product (GDP) by 0.35% after inflation, or $68.2 billion, and create 175,700 new jobs over six years, fewer than the average U.S. economy creates in a month.

According to the report, U.S. exports to Canada and Mexico would increase by $19.1 billion (5.9%) and 14.2 percent (6.7%), respectively. U.S. imports from Canada and Mexico would increase by $19.1 billion (4.8%) and $12.4 billion (3.8%), respectively.

One key point is that it would increase the percentage of a vehicle’s parts that must be made in North America to avoid tariffs from 62.5% under the previous NAFTA to 75% under the USMCA. The new pact would also require that most of those parts be made by workers earning at least $16 an hour—a provision designed to counter cheap Mexican labor. The changes would result in a slight increase in retail vehicle prices, according to the ITC.

The White House also negotiated a reduction in Canadian tariffs on U.S. dairy products, including milk powder and infant formula. But Canada has already completed one of its top priorities: retaining Chapter 19, a dispute resolution mechanism that allows any country to challenge another country’s trade restrictions to a neutral jurisdiction.

Trucks line up to travel from Tijuana, Mexico to the US in December 2019. Photo: AFP

The new agreement also includes provisions to protect the ozone layer, marine environments, and air quality, and establishes a fisheries management system to prevent overfishing in North American waters. But that hasn’t been enough to satisfy environmental groups, who in a statement last month urged members to reject the USMCA.

They assert that the new deal falls short and “will encourage the offshoring of pollution and jobs, create opportunities for notorious polluters, and perpetuate Trump’s pollution legacy for years. Whether the deal fails to address, recognize, and address the climate crisis, and may even contribute to making it worse, is a question for environmentalists to answer in time.