Delegate Tran Van Mao: Complaints should not be handled via email or phone.
(Baonghean.vn) - Participating in the discussion at the hall about the Law on Denunciation (amended), the National Assembly Delegation of Nghe An province, including delegates Nguyen Huu Cau and Tran Van Mao, had notable opinions.
On June 16, the National Assembly worked in the hall. In the morning, delegates discussed in the hall the draft Law on Public Debt Management (amended); Minister of Finance Dinh Tien Dung explained the opinions of National Assembly delegates on the draft Law on Public Debt Management (amended). Next, Chief Justice of the Supreme People's Court Nguyen Hoa Binh presented a proposal to the National Assembly to approve the appointment of 02 Supreme People's Court Judges; Chairwoman of the National Assembly's Judicial Committee Le Thi Nga presented a report on the review of the proposal to approve the appointment of 02 Supreme People's Court Judges; National Assembly delegations met to discuss the approval of the appointment of 02 Supreme People's Court Judges. In the afternoon, the National Assembly voted to pass the Railway Law (amended), discussed the draft Law on Denunciation (amended); Government Inspector General Phan Van Sau explained the opinions of National Assembly deputies on the draft Law on Denunciation (amended). |
Delegate Nguyen Huu Cau (Director of Nghe An Police, Nghe An National Assembly Delegation) said that there were many contents that delegates had expressed their opinions in the group, but after 16 days, they had not been accepted.
Delegate Nguyen Huu Cau said that in order for the Law on Denunciation (amended) to be completed, it is necessary to seriously study, select and absorb the contents of the National Assembly deputies' comments. Regarding the writing style and legal regulations of the draft, there are still many shortcomings; there is also the phenomenon of using spoken language, making it difficult for deputies to participate in giving opinions, it is necessary to use the correct writing style according to legal regulations.
Regarding the content, delegate Nguyen Huu Cau said that the draft's whistleblower protection regulations are not complete and need to be clarified; regarding the content of handling anonymous petitions, the delegate said that the draft is inconsistent with the debate and exchange process at the session. Delegate Nguyen Huu Cau said that it is necessary to expand the form of denunciation, allowing the use of email and phone to denounce, so that denunciation will be more convenient and more widespread.
Participating in the discussion on the Law on Denunciation (amended), delegate Tran Van Mao (Deputy Head of the National Assembly Delegation of Nghe An) highly agreed with the regulations on the form of petition and direct denunciation stipulated in Article 20 of the draft Law. However, delegate Tran Van Mao agreed with the non-regulation of denunciation via email, mobile phone and other forms of denunciation. Because in the age of information development, in practice there may be situations of taking advantage of other people's emails and mobile phones to make denunciations, with the aim of defaming those being denounced.
![]() |
Delegate Tran Van Mao - Deputy Head of the National Assembly Delegation of Nghe An province said that in reality, there may be a phenomenon of using other people's emails or phones to make denunciations, so denunciations from emails or phones should not be handled. Photo: Huyen Thuong |
Regarding anonymous denunciations, delegate Tran Van Mao said that anonymous denunciations should not be handled. In reality, most anonymous denunciations have untrue content. According to the Government's report, State agencies have only handled 87.4% of the total number of anonymous denunciations, of which 59.5% are false denunciations, 28.3% are mixed.
Therefore, if the Law stipulates the handling of anonymous denunciations, it will cause difficulties for state agencies in the process of consideration and settlement. Therefore, it is appropriate to only consider handling denunciations in cases where the denouncer clearly states his/her full name and address as stipulated in Point a, Clause 1, Article 22 of the draft Law. Because individuals with the right to denounce must also be responsible for ensuring the accuracy of the denunciation content and be responsible before the law. Delegate Tran Van Mao also commented on the statute of limitations for denunciations, on the protection of denouncers, on the issue of gender discrimination in the settlement of denunciations, and on the authority to settle denunciations.
PV-CTV Group
RELATED NEWS |
---|