A few words about the 'horoscope statement' case

Last year, I wrote: "The state was born to manage society. Management is an active act of enforcement to establish order, not to follow events. We should encourage individual charity to exploit social resources, but if we let it run wild, it is a mistake. If one person can mobilize, thousands of people can mobilize. Then they will be exploited, then there will be chaos."

At that time, in addition to some "comments" that were so outrageous (that I had to delete them), there was also a threatening message: "You must be responsible to the people of Central Vietnam if you later stop doing charity work." Now it's clear. Just a few seasons and it's already chaos. Until today, I still can't confirm that Thuy Tien is a bad person. Maybe Thuy Tien doesn't "make money" like "Saint Dream" said. But whether eating or not eating, letting individuals do charity freely is a mistake. The state should encourage them, promote them, honor them, but must definitely manage them.

This is not too difficult. For now, the regulation requires those who mobilize charity resources to open an independent account at the Policy Bank and be subject to transparent supervision by the authorities. That would reduce the chaos a lot.

Back to Mrs. "Thanh Mo", to be honest, I don't have much sympathy for people like her. Listening to her speak, I feel frustrated because of her exaggeration. The words she uses are not appropriate to her position. It would be great if a beautiful, rich, luxurious, powerful and talented person like her could control her emotions a little.

However, liking or disliking is one thing, admitting it is another. The informational value she provided cannot be denied. The statement of 1.9 kg of statements is shocking, it has a terrible impact on social networks. However, whether it is 1.9 kg or 1.9 tons, if we continue to argue about betting on diamonds like this, it will probably take another 30,000 tangerine seasons.

A country with only ninety million people, yet millions of people are sitting around watching livestreams of "cow slaughter" is truly alarming. It's not just about money, it's also about culture. I request that the authorities get involved and clarify right and wrong. Either Article 175 for the crime of abuse of trust to appropriate property, or Article 156 for the crime of slander. Whoever violates will be punished. With this level of crime, it probably only needs to be spelled out in one word: PRISON.

People need a civilized interactive environment, don't let people wait all day for "statements". This matter must be left to the authorities. "Am I right, Your Honor?"