A few words about the 'destiny statement' case

Last year, I wrote: "The state was born to manage society. Management is an active act of enforcement to establish order, not to follow events. We should encourage individual charity to exploit social resources, but if we let it run wild, it is a mistake. If one person can mobilize, thousands of people can mobilize. Then it will be exploited, then there will be chaos."

At that time, in addition to some "comments" that were so outrageous (that I had to delete them), there was also a threatening message: "You must be responsible to the people of Central Vietnam if the President stops doing charity work in the future". Now it's clear. Just a few seasons and it's already chaos. Until today, I still can't confirm that Thuy Tien is a bad person. Maybe Thuy Tien doesn't "make money" like "Saint Dream" said. But whether eating or not eating, letting individuals do charity freely is a mistake. The state should encourage them, promote them, honor them, but must definitely manage them.

This should not be too difficult. For now, regulations require those who mobilize charity resources to open independent accounts at the Policy Bank and be subject to transparent supervision by the authorities. That would reduce the chaos a lot.

Back to Mrs. "Saint Dream", to be honest, I don't have much sympathy for people like her. Listening to her speak, I feel frustrated because of her exaggeration. The words she uses are not commensurate with her position. It would be great if a beautiful, rich, luxurious, powerful and talented person like her could control her emotions a little.

However, liking and disliking is one thing, admitting it is another. The value of the information she provided cannot be denied. The statement of 1.9 kg of statements is shocking, it has a terrible impact on social networks. However, whether it is 1.9 kg or 1.9 tons, if we continue to argue about betting on diamonds like this, it will probably take another thirty thousand tangerine seasons.

A country with only ninety million people, yet millions of people sit and watch livestreams of "cow slaughter" is truly alarming. It's not just about money, it's also about culture. I suggest that the authorities get involved and clarify right and wrong. Either Article 175 is the crime of abuse of trust to appropriate property, or Article 156 is the crime of slander. Whoever violates will be punished. With this level of crime, it probably only needs to be spelled out in one word: PRISON.

People need a civilized interactive environment, don't let people spend all day waiting for "statements". This matter must be left to the authorities. "Am I right, my dear?"