Germany beat Slovakia 6-0: The victory doesn't mask the flaws.
The 6-0 win against Slovakia was just a temporary relief. Germany remains vulnerable to counter-attacks and set pieces; recent injuries and controversial personnel decisions regarding Nagelsmann are also contributing factors.
Germany concluded their World Cup qualifying campaign with a 6-0 victory over Slovakia, securing their place in the next round. It was a night that provided everything Julian Nagelsmann needed: goals, relief, and some positive individual performances. However, this emphatic result shouldn't overshadow the reality: Germany remains an incomplete team, with many tactical and personnel questions still needing answers.
From the 6-0 triumph to the bigger picture
The emphatic victory over Slovakia was more like a fresh coat of paint on a house riddled with cracks than a sign of a sustainable revival. Inspired by EURO 2024 – where Germany played cohesively and energetically before being eliminated by Spain – the atmosphere of optimism was quickly replaced by skepticism after just 18 months. The relatively easy qualifying group further highlighted the inconsistencies expected in 2025, especially when compared to the 0-2 defeat against Slovakia in September and the lackluster victories.
Tactical cracks have resurfaced.
Germany's tactical approach has yet to inspire confidence. They remain vulnerable to teams that transition quickly, their counter-attack defense is weak, and set pieces are a persistent weakness. This isn't a new problem, but rather a recurring issue over months, casting doubt on Nagelsmann's direction, even when he doesn't always have a full squad available.
Patchwork squad: injuries and a disrupted rhythm.
Injuries have disrupted stability. Musiala's prolonged absence significantly reduced creativity. Kleindienst – a backup option for Havertz – has been sidelined for months, impacting flexibility in rotating the attacking line. In goal, Ter Stegen's recurring injury forced Baumann to step in, while speculation surrounding Manuel Neuer's return added further pressure. The pace of play and the team's structure were therefore not stable enough to build up form.
Nagelsmann's choice: safe or reasonable?
Nagelsmann's selections were scrutinized closely. The inclusion of Sane and Goretzka was seen as a safe bet, while Stiller and Bischof – players in good form – were left out. The absence of Said El Mala, who had generated high expectations but didn't play, was also disappointing, although the reason of "needing time" is understandable.
Ironically, against Slovakia, it was Sane and Goretzka who impressed, showing that the coach's decision wasn't entirely unfounded. Other bright spots included Ouedraogo's debut and goal, Baku's return, and Woltemade's good form. These positive signs eased the pressure, but also complicated the situation: should we believe in the progress or remain wary of the unpatched gaps?
Pressure to maintain German football identity
German football has always been very strict with itself. Two eliminations in the group stage of the 2018 and 2022 World Cups left a psychological scar, making any mistakes easily exaggerated. Their strong culture of debate – a factor that helps them constantly improve – sometimes turns into heavy pressure on both players and coaches between major tournament cycles.
What's missing to become a true candidate?
Germany's potential is real: young talents like Musiala, Wirtz, and Havertz are entering their prime, while Kimmich and Rüdiger bring experience. But to translate that potential into sustainable strength, they need more than just a relief win: structural stability, sufficient squad depth to rotate without dropping in form, and a definitive solution to their transitional game and set-piece problems.
A World Cup ticket is a given for Germany. Their true value will only be tested when they face top opponents next summer. Until then, the 6-0 victory should be seen as a morale boost – not a cover-up for long-standing problems.
