Teachers "lay out their troops" to lower students' grades

A primary school teacher in Ho Chi Minh City revealed that there are many ways for teachers to “pull” students’ scores. The most common is that when they are invigilating, the teacher ignores them. Students sit next to each other, not in separate rooms, and there are many students, so it is easy for them to look at each other’s papers.

Not to mention, when placing students, many teachers cleverly placed a good student next to a weak student, perhaps she "entrusted" the good student to support them as "a pair of friends to improve together".

Teachers have many ways to "raise" students' scores. Photo for illustration purposes only.

In primary school, each grade submits three questions to the Board of Directors. Teachers focus on reviewing questions in groups so that students can do the test easily. In addition, teachers implicitly understand that students' reading scores are 5 points, regardless of whether students can read or not.

This teacher also said that while the public was shocked when 4th and 5th graders could not read, everyone considered it a joke, but for teachers it was a matter that everyone knew. That was the consequence of the disease of achievement, everything was evaluated by competition without substance.

Teachers cope to avoid losing competition points, so the phenomenon of memorization and model lessons, which everyone knows is anti-educational, is still thoroughly applied. At least it helps students easily pass the "barrier" of scores, and teachers do not lose competition points.

During final exams, it is common to see students revising by reciting like parrots or copying model essays and model answers. Teachers review for students but they only need to memorize for the test, not understand.

In order for students to get high scores, many teachers put pressure on them and their families, forcing them to study, and creating terrible exam review outlines. For a long time, everyone has known that the education sector has a rule that no homework is given to primary school students, but that is only... theoretical, especially during exam season, students still have to do homework, make outlines, and copy and memorize sample essays.

In Ho Chi Minh City, during semester exams, the leaders of the Department of Education and Training always direct primary schools to organize seriously, thoughtfully, fairly and objectively. Teachers are absolutely not allowed to remind students of their work, solve problems while supervising, and arbitrarily raise or lower scores when grading students' work.

Schools must also have a review plan for students and a separate plan to tutor weak students. Absolutely do not chase after achievements to cope, causing pressure and creating a tense, heavy atmosphere for teachers, students and their families.

Cheating on exams and teaching for grades

Not only is cheating on exams to "pull up" students' scores, but the pressure of students' scores to compete with teachers also has a negative impact on teaching methods.

Although the industry calls for innovation in the direction of teaching to develop learners' abilities and qualities, the goal of both teachers and students is still scores. Teaching is actually neglected, leading to many paradoxes.

Exams, pressure on scores and achievements greatly affect the quality of teaching.

Many teachers are lazy to change their teaching methods, teach perfunctorily... but... their achievements are still very high. On the contrary, teachers who put a lot of effort into creating and innovating in teaching can have their points deducted when taking exams. Teaching in a way that students can get high scores even though they know that it is not the best way for them is the priority of many teachers.

Ms. Nguyen Le Anh, a secondary school teacher in Dong Nai, said that to combat achievement in education, we must first change the way we test, evaluate, and compete for both teachers and students. Exams must be designed to test students' true abilities, not just memorization or cramming.

As for teachers, to be creative and to teach effectively, they need an open space. But currently in most schools, every little thing teachers do is converted into competition points, leading to teachers working in a very stifling way, as if they are being monitored.

They work only focusing on results without investing in the teaching process. And the results often do not reflect the true abilities of the students and teachers.

The core of fighting against achievements in education is to teach for real, learn for real and evaluate for real. As for the current "force" of achievement competition, if the "coping" fails, teachers encounter a class with many weak students, they consider it... bad luck.