With a recount, it will be difficult for Clinton to turn defeat into victory.

A recount is a complex and costly process, and it is unlikely to change the outcome of an election.

At the end of the US presidential election, Democratic candidate Hillary Clinton won the popular vote but lost the electoral college vote. Donald Trump won with 306 electoral votes, while Clinton only secured 232 electoral votes.

Donald Trump and Hillary Clinton (Photo: AFP/Getty).

On November 25th, former Green Party presidential candidate Jill Stein proposed and initiated fundraising to petition for a recount in three key swing states—Wisconsin, Pennsylvania, and Michigan—to determine whether there was a potential cyberattack that skewed the results.

To date, former Green Party presidential candidate Jill Stein has raised nearly $6 million, nearing her goal of $7 million to cover the costs of counting votes in the three aforementioned states.

On November 26, the campaign committee of Democratic presidential candidate Hillary Clinton also announced that it would participate in the recount in Wisconsin. Marc Elias, the committee's legal counsel, stated that they had no evidence of cyber intrusion, but would participate "to ensure the process is conducted fairly for all parties."

Former Green Party presidential candidate Jill Stein (Photo: Reuters).

In all three states considered strategic (Wisconsin, Pennsylvania, and Michigan), President-elect Donald Trump won by a narrow margin: just 0.3% in Michigan, 1.2% in Pennsylvania, and 0.7% in Wisconsin. Supporters of a recount hoped that if Clinton won the 46 electoral votes in those three states, she could potentially stage a comeback.

While Clinton's supporters were harboring that hope, the Obama administration announced that the election had not been hacked by any party.

A recount is a complex and costly process, and it is unlikely to change the outcome of an election unless widespread fraud is proven. Experts have expressed skepticism about this possibility.

Wisconsin was widely considered a sure win for the Democratic candidate, but Trump unexpectedly won, securing all 10 electoral votes. The Wisconsin Election Commission has received two recount requests from Jill Stein and businessman Rocky Roque De La Fuente. State officials are now preparing to conduct a full recount as requested by these two individuals. Election officials will need to examine millions of paper ballots and 5% of the electronic ballots.

A New York-based reporter for The Guardian quoted Wisconsin Election Commission Director Michael Haas as saying that the commission was preparing for a recount, although they saw no evidence of possible interference with the state's election system. "We have no reason to suspect that any voting devices were tampered with," Haas said.

In Pennsylvania, there are no paper records for recounts, as the election was conducted entirely on electronic touchscreens. But because these machines are not connected to the internet, officials say they cannot be hacked.

Trump was declared the winner in Michigan last Thursday with 10,704 votes, but the state's election commission director insisted there was no evidence of hacking. "It's just speculation, and I don't think it works well for anyone," Chris Thomas, director of the Michigan Election Commission, told The New York Times.

According to VOV