Violating Directive 16, young man argued and resisted the authorities
(Baonghean.vn) - Justifying going out without essential reasons, DVS (born in 1983) residing in Dong Ho hamlet, Dien Phong commune said that the commune police only have the right to advise people to stay at home and not ban them from going out.
Dien Chau District is one of 14 localities in Nghe An province implementing Directive 16. This afternoon (August 24), the working group of Dien Phong Commune Police (Dien Chau) patrolled and discovered DVS (born in 1983) residing in Dong Ho hamlet, Dien Phong commune, out on the street without an essential reason.
| DVS at the time of detecting the violation. Clip: Provided by CA |
During the inspection, DVS could not present any documents proving that it was necessary to go out. When the working group made a record, S. did not sign the record and insisted that Dien Phong commune did not have any.Directive No.16.As for the entire Dien Chau district implementing Directive 16, people are free to travel within the district as long as they do not leave the district.
 |
| Dien Phong Commune Police made a record of violations against DVS. Photo: CACC |
After returning to the commune People's Committee headquarters to work, DVS continued to argue, deliberately not listening to the explanation, asking the working group to show the social distancing decision of Dien Phong commune with the red seal, not accepting a copy, asking to see Directive 16, etc. At the same time, he did not sign the minutes with the reason that the Commune Police only had the right to advise people to stay at home and not to go out.
Currently, the working group has drawn up a record and completed the dossier to request the Chairman of the Commune People's Committee to consider issuing a decision to fine DVS/.
