Provincial Party Secretary Thai Thanh Quy periodically received citizens in December

Also attending were comrades: Nguyen Van Thong - Standing Deputy Secretary of the Provincial Party Committee; Le Hong Vinh - Member of the Provincial Party Committee Standing Committee, Standing Vice Chairman of the Provincial People's Committee; Ho Le Ngoc - Member of the Standing Committee, Head of the Provincial Party Committee's Internal Affairs Committee; leaders of relevant departments, branches and localities. Photo: Thanh Duy

At the citizen reception session, Mr. Pham Xuan Bay, Hamlet 11, Dien Yen Commune, reported that the People's Committee of Dien Chau District was slow in issuing the Land Use Right Certificate to his family according to the Appeal Administrative Judgment No. 177/2019/HC-PT, dated July 30, 2019 of the High People's Court in Hanoi and the Decision on compulsory enforcement of administrative judgment.

According to the authorities, Mr. Pham Xuan Bay's family agreed with the measurement results of the Branch of the Land Registration Office on the shape and area of ​​the land plot, but did not agree with the boundary of the adjacent part with Mr. Vu Van Hoa's family and did not sign to confirm the boundary of the adjacent land plot.

Mr. Pham Xuan Bay, hamlet 11, Dien Yen commune, Dien Chau district presented his opinion at the citizen reception session. Photo: Thanh Duy

Mr. Bay's family requested that the eastern boundary - that is, the border between his family's land plot and Mr. Vu Van Hoa's family's land plot - must show a rural road. However, Mr. Vu Van Hoa's family is currently using land adjacent to Mr. Bay's family's land plot, which does not show a road.

Therefore, up to now, the measurement and correction of cadastral maps to serve the preparation of registration dossiers for the issuance of Certificates of land use rights, house ownership rights and other assets attached to Mr. Bay's family's land at the above land plot has not been carried out.

Chairman of Dien Chau District People's Committee Tang Van Luyen speaks at the citizen reception session. Photo: Thanh Duy

After listening to the opinions of citizens and the People's Committee of Dien Chau district, the People's Committee of Dien Yen commune... Concluding this content, Provincial Party Secretary Thai Thanh Quy emphasized that the key to resolving the case is to determine whether or not there is a road located on the eastern boundary between Mr. Pham Xuan Bay's family's land plot and Mr. Vu Van Hoa's family's land plot.

On that basis, the Provincial Party Secretary assigned the Provincial People's Committee to direct the Department of Natural Resources and Environment to establish an independent working group, requesting Dien Chau district to provide complete documents and procedures to determine whether this road exists or not. The time to complete is 1 month, thereby reporting to the Citizen Reception Council of the Provincial Party Secretary to direct the final settlement of the matter.

The head of the Provincial Party Committee also noted that the implementation process also determined the responsibilities of the relevant parties, and that any shortcomings of the commune government (if any) must also be handled. At the same time, through this incident, it is recommended that the district's viewpoint in resolving the cases must be clear.

Mr. Pham Binh, Tan Phuong block, Vinh Tan ward, Vinh city presented his opinion at the citizen reception session. Photo: Thanh Duy

Next, the Provincial Party Secretary received citizen Pham Binh, Tan Phuong block, Vinh Tan ward, Vinh city. Mr. Binh requested the Vinh City People's Committee to issue a Certificate of land use rights for an area of ​​400m²which his family uses as a house in Tan Phuong block, Vinh Tan ward.

Regarding this issue, the citizen's petition has been considered and resolved by the competent authorities according to regulations. Specifically, regarding the origin of the above land area, in 1989, Mr. Binh took over the pumping station of Vinh Urban Infrastructure Management and Development Company and built a house on an area of ​​126.5m2.²andagricultural production around it.

When the Provincial People's Committee decided to reclaim the above land area to hand over to the investor to carry out the urban project, Mr. Binh was not compensated for the land. The reason is that on the cadastral maps, this is shown as specialized land according to the provisions of the Land Law and only about 80% of the assets on the land are supported.

Chairman of Vinh City People's Committee Tran Ngoc Tu speaks at the citizen reception session. Photo: Thanh Duy

At that time, Vinh City supported Mr. Binh with 44.8 million VND, he received the support money and signed a commitment to hand over the land. In 2011, Mr. Binh complained about the decisions of Vinh City People's Committee on the issue of not compensating for the land. After that, during the settlement process, Vinh City People's Committee still decided to compensate Mr. Binh with 126.5m². He also received support from the project investor for the difference in land area when he was resettled.

Disagreeing with the settlement decisions, Mr. Pham Binh filed a lawsuit at the Vinh City People's Court, Nghe An Province People's Court, and the Supreme People's Court. The court agencies all affirmed that the Vinh City People's Committee had resolved the case reasonably, even though Mr. Binh did not meet the conditions for resettlement land. The Provincial People's Committee also directed the competent authorities to review and affirmed that the Vinh City People's Committee's settlement was completely correct and thorough.

Comrade Thai Thanh Quy - Alternate member of the Party Central Committee, Secretary of the Provincial Party Committee concluded at the citizen reception session. Photo: Thanh Duy

In a discussion with citizens, the Provincial Party Secretary pointed out that the authorities have paid attention to resolving citizens' petitions. However, the area that Mr. Pham Binh requested to be granted a Land Use Right Certificate on the cadastral maps of 1993 and 2001 is shown as specialized land. The authorities have all proven that this land was encroached upon by him, so there is no basis for resolving the petition. If he does not agree with the conclusion of the authorities, he can submit a petition to the competent Court for consideration.