Why are more and more places saying "no" to in-service and private sector?

(Baonghean)Starting from Da Nang to Nam Dinh... and now Hanoi is the locality that continuously says "no" to private and part-time jobs through recruiting civil servants in the Education sector and continuing to recruit for the coming years.

Why is there this "unofficial" phenomenon, because everyone knows that the incident will cause public uproar and cause a lot of pressure?

The most obvious is the attitude of opposing the distinction between types of training while our State is implementing the socialization of education and the reality shows that such distinction is both unscientific and lacking in vivid reality. That, the important thing is to organize fair and objective examinations to select people with enough talent and virtue to serve the people, not to "torture" the people as before. That, any type of training produces... defective products, not just private and in-service training. That...

There is also no shortage of strong opinions when presenting practical stories like "civil servants sitting in the sky making policies" that make implementation both funny and sad. Or the specific story of "100 million civil servants" of Hanoi at the recent People's Council meeting that the public is still discussing, waiting for the results of the inspection.

But the reality is that many types of training that have been "blossoming with a hundred flowers" for a long time have caused the majority of students and university graduates to fall into unemployment. The simple problem of life is that there is no need for jobs, not the story of distinguishing types of training. Along with the development of science and technology, the need for job placement in the State apparatus increasingly requires streamlining and efficiency. The screening and competition therefore become more and more fierce and intense. It is not by chance that some majors are not expanded, or even have to close. It is not by chance that some schools and majors that are trendy will step back on their own, giving way to the regulation of the market and social needs in each period and stage. Stories like "investment outside the industry" will gradually return to their proper place.

Public opinion is also very interested in the story of the pilot recruitment exam for officials at the Department of Education and Training of Quang Ninh. There will be many experiences drawn from this. There will be a fundamental change when training, using, and appointing are carried out objectively and honestly, fundamentally eliminating all "buying" (position, degree, crime, age...) that our society has long condemned.

Therefore, what our society is aiming for is not only saying "no" to private and part-time jobs, but the main thing is that the education and training system must produce a complete product with few errors, a transparent selection mechanism, finding the right person for the right job, capable of meeting the increasingly high demands of life.

Phu Chau (Hanoi)